نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Sermon 216 of Nahj al-Balāgha is one of the most important Alid texts in explaining the logic of just governance and
Sermon 216 of Nahj al-Balāgha is one of the most important Alid texts in explaining the logic of just governance and critiquing despotic mechanisms. The present study, adopting a discourse-semiotic approach and focusing on the main justice/despotism square in Greimas’s model, seeks to show how “right” becomes the central signifier of political order in this sermon and how the meaning of justice is shaped in the movement from tawāṣuf to tanāṣuf and from the claim of right to the establishment of right. The findings show that justice in this sermon is not an individual virtue, but a reciprocal structure of mutual rights, the critique-acceptance of power, and the critical participation of society. Conversely, despotism does not appear only in manifest injustice, but passes through the intermediate stages of finding the right burdensome, the suspension of criticism, the spread of exaggerated praise, and the dominance of desire, until it leads to oppression, the suspension of rulings, and the collapse of social order. Moreover, Imam Ali’s response to the flattery of one of his companions shows that justice in this sermon, in addition to its juridical dimension, is a linguistic and narrative act for returning the political sphere from praise to counsel and from passivity to collective responsibility. Therefore, Greimas’s square in this study has been employed not as a static model, but as a tool for understanding the dynamics of transition from justice to despotism and vice versa.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)